ESG Guide
The acronym stands for environmental, social and corporate governance responsibility, i.e. a set of standards for corporate behaviour that socially conscious investors use to screen and assess potential investments.
E is for environment: the examination of the positive and negative environmental impact of a business.
The question "How seriously is environmental responsibility taken?" can be answered by looking in particular at the following aspects: gas emissions (carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases), biodiversity conservation, air, water and soil pollution, forest, land, waste and water management, resource use, energy saving and emission reduction efforts.
Most people – wrongly – identify the whole approach with this area, as it is the best known and indeed the most emphatic.
S is for social: addressing social issues outside and inside the organisation.
In relation to the question "How are stakeholders (employees, suppliers, customers) treated?", the most important aspects are human rights management, labour code compliance, gender equality, employee health, development and safety, local community satisfaction, data security, product safety and quality, supplier issues.
G is for governance: the set of decision-making mechanisms and senior management activities.
Factors that provide the answer to the question "How are the rights of small investors and other stakeholders ensured in corporate governance?": board independence and diversity, executive compensation, anti-corruption policy, fair practices, transparent taxation, shareholder rights, remuneration policy. The leadership approach has a strong impact on the other two categories, as it can determine long-term success.
Behind the three letters is a holistic approach to examining all segments of companies, thus it is not enough to use only green technologies or to engage in directly non-polluting activities (e.g. financial companies), as these are only one aspect of the matter.
Companies with these considerations in mind can attract more cheap capital from investors, tend to prioritise ethical considerations, perform better in the stock market, have a more predictable risk profile, and can gain an advantage in the labour market and reduce their operating costs. At the same time, developing credible company-specific methodologies (not only in communication), integrating these into everyday life, and producing detailed performance reports can be challenging.